Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Captain Yellow's avatar

So, despite all the red flags thrown up by the Bakrie Group's stewardship of Brisbane, your conclusion is "I have no doubt that Mr Bakrie is fully committed to our project."? The argument that the difference is that the ownership of OUFC is a personal endeavour by Anindya whereas Brisbane was owned by his group of companies is spurious. Football club ownership is a passion project for individuals, regardless of what corporate vehicle is used to hold the shares.

Rather than looking at some sort of partnership, we should be using Brisbane as a warning sign and a reason why we should keep check on what is going on at OUFC, particularly with regards to communication from the board. For example, we were told that a planning application for The Triangle would be submitted in Oct/Nov. We're two months down the line and it's still not been submitted. The clock is ticking on that project and such delays could be fatal.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts